Topics

TUPE

New and updated

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    27 January 2016
    Type:
    Law reports

    Amanda Steadman is a professional support lawyer, Iain Naylor, Lucy Sorell and Rachael Wake are associates, and Jessica-Alice Curtis is a trainee solicitor at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

  • TUPE: no relevant transfer where original employer is one of several transferees

    Date:
    24 November 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that there is no relevant TUPE transfer where a restructure results in an employee moving from an employment contract with one employer to an employment contract with several employers, including the original employer.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 November 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    Jessica Alice-Curtis is a trainee solicitor, Lucy Melville is a paralegal and Nigel Cousin, David Rintoul and Rachael Wake are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 October 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    David Malamatenios is a partner and Sandra Martins, Krishna Santra and Colin Makin are senior associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

  • TUPE transfers: employee on indefinite sick leave not transferred

    Date:
    10 September 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    An Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that an employee, not working in his employer's business because of health problems, but retained as an employee to receive permanent health insurance (PHI) payments, was not "assigned" to the organised grouping of employees for the purposes of a TUPE transfer.

  • TUPE: A third party cannot dictate whether or not an employee is "assigned"

    Date:
    2 September 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    A recent ruling in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) gives clarity about when an employee is "assigned" to an employer before a TUPE transfer. In his latest TUPE update, Dr John McMullen explains the ruling's implications for employers.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 May 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    David Malamatenios is a partner, Colin Makin, Sandra Martins and Krishna Santra are senior associates, and Hinal Raichura is a trainee at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Dismissal: No separate decision to reinstate required where appeal against dismissal upheld

    Date:
    1 May 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Salmon v Castlebeck Care (Teesdale) Ltd (in administration) and another [2015] IRLR 189 EAT, the EAT held that an employee who was dismissed for gross misconduct, but whose contractual appeal against dismissal was successful, did not need to be formally reinstated by her employer for her contract of employment to be resurrected so as to continue as if it had not been terminated.

  • How to comply with the law on dismissal of employees in relation to TUPE transfers

    Type:
    How to

    Practical guidance on dismissals in the context of a TUPE transfer, including who has liability for dismissals; economic, technical and organisational reasons for dismissal; and information and consultation.

  • Can an employer change the terms and conditions of transferred employees if a certain amount of time has passed since the TUPE transfer?

    Type:
    FAQs