Employment law cases

All items: Work organisation

  • Cases on appeal

    Cases on appeal provides news on key case law developments that are expected.

  • EAT rules on extent of agency worker rights

    Date:
    20 January 2021

    In Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd and another v Kocur and another; Kocur and another v Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd and another, the Employment Appeal Tribunal made a number of determinations about agency worker rights, including that agency workers are not entitled to apply for, or to be considered for vacancies on the same terms as directly recruited employees.

  • Agency workers: Worker supplied exclusively to Royal Mail entitled to same conditions as permanent staff

    Date:
    22 July 2020

    In Kocur and others v Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd and another, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a worker supplied by an agency to work temporarily for Royal Mail was an agency worker, despite the fact that he was supplied exclusively to Royal Mail on a regular basis over four years.

  • Agency workers: No entitlement to same number of hours as permanent staff

    Date:
    17 July 2019

    In Kocur v Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd and another, the Court of Appeal held that agency workers' entitlement to the "same basic working and employment conditions" as permanent staff after 12 weeks does not extend to being given the same number of hours' work.

  • Agency worker's higher pay did not offset inferior holiday entitlement

    Date:
    14 March 2018

    In Kocur v Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd and another, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that a failure to provide an agency worker with the same annual leave entitlement and paid rest breaks as those enjoyed by permanent employees could not be offset by a higher rate of pay.

  • Agency workers: calculating compensation when hirer liable for breach

    Date:
    24 January 2017

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has confirmed the correct approach that tribunals should follow when calculating compensation for an infringement of reg.5(1) of the Agency Workers Regulations 2010.

  • Whistleblowing: Whistleblower can be both employee or worker of agency and worker of end user

    Date:
    31 December 2016

    In McTigue v University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust [2016] IRLR 742 EAT, the EAT held that, in order for a claimant to be a "worker" within the meaning of the extended "whistleblower" definition in s.43K of the Employment Rights Act 1996, all that is required is that the end user substantially determined the terms under which the claimant carried out his or her work. It is not necessary to show that the end user determined those terms to any greater or lesser degree than the agency, of whom the claimant might also be an employee or worker.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 May 2016

    David Malamatenios is a partner at Colman Coyle Solicitors. He rounds up the latest rulings.

  • Employers entitled to favour employees over agency workers for permanent vacancies

    Date:
    3 August 2015

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that there is nothing in agency workers laws to prevent employers from choosing permanent members of staff over agency workers for job vacancies.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 December 2014

    David Malamatenios is a partner and Krishna Santra and Colin Makin are senior associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

About this category

Employment law cases: HR and legal information and guidance relating to work organisation.