Epstein v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
This report relates to 1 case(s)
Epstein v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead EAT/0250/07 (0 other reports)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that, in the circumstances of the case, the issue of disparate treatment did not arise when an employee was dismissed but another was not disciplined.
Mr Epstein, a lifeguard at a swimming pool, was dismissed for a gross error of judgment in failing to realise that a user of the pool was in difficulty.