Employment law cases

All items: Employment tribunal procedure

  • Court of Appeal decides if email advice on avoiding discriminatory dismissal is admissible

    Date:
    25 October 2019

    In Curless v Shell International Ltd, the Court of Appeal upheld the tribunal decision that an email that contained legal advice on how to avoid a discriminatory dismissal is protected by legal privilege because it was not advice to act in an "underhand or iniquitous way".

  • Claimants cannot block publication of employment tribunal decisions

    Date:
    19 August 2019

    In L v Q Ltd, the Court of Appeal held that the principle of open justice precludes an employment tribunal from accepting a claimant's request that its judgment not be published on the public register of tribunal decisions.

  • Court of Appeal confirms that expatriate employee is protected by British employment law

    Date:
    10 January 2019

    In The British Council v Jeffery; Green v SIG Trading Ltd, the Court of Appeal held that whether or not an expatriate employee has sufficiently strong connections with Great Britain to come within the scope of British employment law is a question of fact, but that such an evaluation is a question of law.

  • Legal privilege: Email on how to disguise discriminatory dismissal is admissible

    Date:
    24 August 2018

    In X v Y Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that an email containing legal advice on how to disguise a discriminatory dismissal as a redundancy is not protected by legal advice privilege and is admissible as evidence in a tribunal.

  • Covert recording of disciplinary panel's private deliberations was admissible

    Date:
    11 April 2018

    In Fleming v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that covert recordings of the private deliberations of the disciplinary panel were admissible as evidence, except for any content covered by legal professional privilege.

  • Discrimination: Instigating disciplinary procedure was start of continuing act

    Date:
    21 February 2018

    In Hale v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the decision to instigate the disciplinary procedure was not a one-off act, but the start of a state of affairs that would continue until the conclusion of the disciplinary process.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 February 2017

    Chris Cook is a partner and Keely Rushmore is a senior associate at SA Law. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 November 2016

    Chris Cook is partner and head of employment and Keely Rushmore is senior associate at SA Law. They round up the latest rulings.

  • £69,484 costs order after NHS trust was sent covert recording of meeting with lawyers

    Date:
    17 June 2016

    In this unusual case, an employment tribunal struck out four claimants' cases and ordered them to pay £17,371 each in costs after the respondent NHS trust's chief executive and lawyers were sent a covert recording of the trust receiving legal advice.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 July 2015

    David Malamatenios is a partner, and Krishna Santra, Sandra Martins and Colin Makin are senior associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

About this category

Employment law cases: HR and legal information and guidance relating to employment tribunal procedure.