Law reports

Precedent-setting cases from the EAT and appellate courts, along with reports of selected tribunal cases.

This tool will help you:

Stay up to date with developments in case law.
Keep informed about the situations that have led to employment tribunal claims.

Browse by case title

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Search by case title

Stop press

Decisions
Cases on Appeal

Age discrimination: Requiring semi-retired dog handler to work full time was discriminatory

Date:

2 July 2020

In Broadist v HM Prison Service, an employment tribunal found that the employer's refusal to allow a semi-retired dog handler to remain working on a part-time basis with an alternative dog, after his dog had died, amounted to indirect age discrimination.
Redundancy: Requirement to apply for equivalent jobs was unfair

Date:

22 June 2020

In Gwynedd Council v Barratt and another, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the dismissal of two teachers who were required to apply for their own jobs following a reorganisation was unfair.
Disciplinary investigations: "Inherently flawed" process made dismissal unfair

Date:

2 June 2020

In Adenusi v London Underground Ltd, an employment tribunal held that the employee's dismissal for sexual harassment was unfair because the employer did not carry out a reasonable investigation.
TUPE: Improvements to contractual benefits before transfer were void

Date:

27 May 2020

In Ferguson and others v Astrea Asset Management Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the transferor's substantial improvements to the employment contracts of senior employees shortly before the transfer were void under TUPE legislation and the EU abuse of law principle.
ECJ considers if homophobic comments made in radio interview breached EU law

Date:

6 May 2020

In NH v Associazione Avvocatura per i diritti LGBTI, the European Court of Justice held that a senior lawyer's comments on a radio programme that he would not wish to recruit homosexual people fell within the scope of the Equal Treatment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC) even though his firm was not recruiting, or planning to recruit, at the time.

You said it...

I would certainly recommend XpertHR for its up-to-date legal information and ability to make one’s life much easier at the click of a button.

Rebecca Lomas, HR administrator, Nielsen UK

Trending

Explore XpertHR

Learn more

Customers

Get in touch

Connect with us

The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.

View our privacy policy, cookie policy and supported browsers.