Employee's application for benefit under unsigned contract meant he was bound by its terms
-
expand disabled
FW Farnsworth Ltd and another v Lacy and others [2013] IRLR 198 HC (0 other reports)
contracts of employment | unsigned contracts | contractual terms
The High Court has held that an employee's application for medical cover under the terms of his new, but unsigned, contract of employment meant that he was bound by its terms, including restrictive covenants.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
