Topics

Restrictive covenants

New and updated

  • Date:
    1 November 2016
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Libel: Email stating employee dismissed for gross misconduct not libellous

    In Theedom v Nourish Trading Ltd (t/a CSP Recruitment) and another [2016] IRLR 866 HC, the High Court dismissed an employee's libel claim in respect of emails sent by his employer about his misconduct.

  • Date:
    1 June 2016
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Case round-up

    Beth Staniland is a trainee solicitor, and Emma Cousins, Ciara Jenkins, Iain Naylor and Lucy Sorell are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Date:
    16 September 2015
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Fair dismissal of Ministry of Defence worker who appeared as a medium while on sick leave

    An employment tribunal has rejected the unfair dismissal claim of an employee who was caught making a public appearance as a medium while on sick leave.

  • Date:
    1 March 2015
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Case round-up

    David Malamatenios is a partner, and Colin Makin and Krishna Santra are senior associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Date:
    1 December 2014
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Case round-up

    David Malamatenios is a partner and Krishna Santra and Colin Makin are senior associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Date:
    1 August 2014
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Restrictive covenants: Poorly drafted unambiguous non-competition covenant was nonetheless binding

    In Prophet plc v Huggett [2014] IRLR 797 CA, the Court of Appeal held that an unambiguous non-competition covenant was binding even though, because the drafting was poorly thought through, it was "toothless" and the employee was free to take up employment with a competitor.

  • Date:
    25 July 2014
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Drafting defect in restrictive covenant: Court of Appeal permits ex-employee to work for competitor

    The Court of Appeal has held that an employer was bound by the terms of a restrictive covenant in an employment contract that, on a literal reading, had the unintended result that an ex-employee was not restricted from working for a competitor.

  • Date:
    1 June 2014
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Case round-up

    Amanda Steadman is a professional support lawyer and Ed Gregory, Rosie Kight and Joanne Magill are associate solicitors at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Date:
    1 December 2013
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Case round-up

    Colin Makin, Krishna Santra, Linda Quinn and Sandra Martins are senior associates and Melissa Powys-Rodrigues is an associate at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Type:
    Tasks

    Include restrictive covenants in a contract of employment

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to restrictive covenants.