Topics

Collective redundancies - information and consultation

New and updated

  • Date:
    15 February 1993
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Judicial review: Pit closures without use of review procedure were unlawful

    British Coal had a statutory obligation to use a review procedure agreed with the trade unions in relation to proposed pit closures, holds the High Court in R v British Coal Corporation and Secretary of State for Trade and Industry ex parte Vardy and others.

  • Date:
    1 October 1985
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Transport & General Workers' Union v Ledbury Preserves (1928) Ltd

    In Transport & General Workers' Union v Ledbury Preserves (1928) Ltd [1985] IRLR 412 EAT, the EAT held that in a potential redundancy situation there must be "sufficient meaningful" consultation before notices of dismissal are sent out.

  • Date:
    1 August 1978
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    The Bakers' Union v Clarks of Hove Ltd

    In The Bakers' Union v Clarks of Hove Ltd [1978] IRLR 366 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the EAT had incorrectly set aside the finding by the Industrial Tribunal that the employers' insolvency was not a special circumstance rendering it not reasonably practicable for them to comply with the redundancy consultation provisions of the Employment Protection Act, section 99.

  • Date:
    1 April 1978
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Transport & General Workers' Union v Nationwide Haulage Ltd

    In Transport & General Workers' Union v Nationwide Haulage Ltd [1978] IRLR 143 IT, the Industrial Tribunal held that the two sets of redundancies were not aggregated since there was no evidence that at the time of making the first set of redundancies there was an intention to follow them shortly with the second set.

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to collective redundancies - information and consultation.