-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on University College London v Brown, in which the EAT considered the basis on which the employer's "sole or main purpose" is to be judged in an unlawful detriment claim.
-
- Date:
- 13 January 2021
- Type:
- Podcasts and webinars
We highlight key cases due to be decided this year and discuss their impact on HR. These include cases on: worker status, holiday pay, the national minimum wage and sleep-in care workers, trade unions and collective bargaining, and equal pay.
-
- Type:
- Indicators
Updated on 21 April 2020 to include a note from the ONS in response to the coronavirus pandemic and changes to the labour disputes section of the monthly labour market report.
-
- Type:
- Quick reference
Updated to reflect an increase in the limits applying to employment tribunal awards, with effect from 6 April 2020.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Royal Mail Group Ltd v Communication Workers Union, in which the Court of Appeal gave guidance on what amounts to unlawful interference in the conduct of a ballot.
-
- Date:
- 17 December 2019
- Type:
- Law reports
In Cadent Gas Ltd v Singh, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that an employee was unfairly dismissed due to his trade union activities and that his manager's hostility towards him could be attributed to the employer.
-
- Date:
- 17 December 2019
- Type:
- Commentary and analysis
Following the December 2019 general election, consultant editor Darren Newman examines the new majority Conservative Government's potential employment law plans.
-
- Date:
- 17 June 2019
- Type:
- Law reports
In Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and others, the Court of Appeal held that the employer had not made unlawful inducements when it sent letters to employees asking them to agree a pay deal that had been rejected by their trade union.
-
- Date:
- 18 December 2018
- Type:
- Law reports
In R (on the application of the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain) v the Central Arbitration Committee and another, the High Court held that Deliveroo riders are not workers and therefore are not automatically entitled to a collective bargaining arrangement.
-
- Date:
- 21 June 2018
- Type:
- Commentary and analysis
Consultant editor Darren Newman looks at a recent case in which the Court of Appeal had to consider if, in sharing information from a manager's desk diary, a trade union rep had acted outside the scope of trade union activities for the purposes of the automatically unfair dismissal protection afforded by s.152 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
