The Ministry of Justice has released its latest round of data on tribunals - the first full quarter since fees were abolished last summer.
Updated to include information on de Souza E Souza v Primark Stores Ltd, concerning an employment tribunal recommendation.
Updated to include information on Hale v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, in which the EAT considered if the decision to instigate the disciplinary procedure was a one-off act, for the purpose of the time limit for the claim.
Updated to include details of the increase in the limits on employment tribunal awards, effective from 6 April 2018.
In Hale v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the decision to instigate the disciplinary procedure was not a one-off act, but the start of a state of affairs that would continue until the conclusion of the disciplinary process.
In South Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service v Mansell and others, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that workers can be awarded compensation for injury to feelings in working time detriment claims.
In Carrabyne v Department for Work and Pensions, the employment tribunal awarded £110,165 to a disabled claimant who was dismissed while on a final written attendance warning following an absence unrelated to her disabilities.
The Government consults on the recommendations in the "Taylor review of modern working practices" on the enforcement of employment rights.
More than £1.8m in refunds have been processed since employment tribunal fees were ruled unlawful, according to the Ministry of Justice.
HR and legal information and guidance relating to employment disputes.