-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on decisions of the Supreme Court in Gilham v Ministry of Justice and Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti, and the Court of Appeal in Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd.
-
- Type:
- Law reports
Updated to reflect that the Court of Appeal will not hear the appeal in Awan v ICTS UK Ltd because the parties reached a settlement.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Gilham v Ministry of Justice, in which the Supreme Court considered the status of judicial officeholders for the purpose of the right to freedom of expression and whistleblowing protection.
-
- Date:
- 5 December 2019
- Type:
- Commentary and analysis
With just one week until the general election, Kerry Garcia and Jackie Penlington of Stevens & Bolton LLP examine what the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats are proposing for immigration.
-
- Date:
- 4 December 2019
- Type:
- Law reports
In Dewhurst and others v Revisecatch Ltd t/a Ecourier and another, an employment tribunal controversially held that TUPE protection extends beyond employees to cover workers.
-
- Date:
- 3 December 2019
- Type:
- Legal guidance
As always, HR professionals have had their fair share of employment law cases to keep track of in 2019. We count down the 10 most important judgments of the year that every employer should know about.
-
- Date:
- 3 December 2019
- Type:
- Audio and video
Should the same punishment be handed down to everyone when there are multiple culprits? Can an expired warning be taken into account? Can a disciplinary sanction be increased on appeal? We discuss some common dilemmas for employers when deciding on disciplinary penalties.
-
- Type:
- Policies and documents
Updated to take account of the ICO's template "appropriate policy document", which employers must have in place when processing special category personal data and criminal records data.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to reflect new ICO guidance on special categories of personal data.
-
- Date:
- 28 November 2019
- Type:
- Law reports
In Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti, the Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal for making protected disclosures is hidden behind an invented reason that is adopted by the decision-maker, the reason for the dismissal is the hidden reason rather than the invented one.
