Topics

Benefits

New and updated

  • Insurers entitled to reduce benefit to women

    Date:
    1 March 2001
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Scott v MPFS (Insurance Services Ltd) a Central London County Court (Judge Hallgarten QC) has ruled that the underwriters of the Metropolitan Police medical insurance fund did not unlawfully discriminate on grounds of sex by reducing benefits payable to women police officers in respect of permanent total disablement to half of those payable to male police officers.

  • Construction of contract: PHI cover did not cease when employee left service

    Date:
    1 November 1999
    Type:
    Law reports

    A restriction in an insurance policy underwriting a contractual permanent health insurance scheme, which disentitled an employee to benefits on leaving service, was not incorporated by reference or implication into his contract of employment, holds the High Court in Villella v MFI Furniture Centres Ltd.

  • Unlawful exclusion from benefits

    Date:
    1 March 1999
    Type:
    Law reports

    A female employee who was unjustifiably excluded from appraisals and the benefits of a profit-share scheme and a one-off share issue because she was a casual employee, was indirectly discriminated against on grounds of sex, holds an Ashford employment tribunal (Chair: D E de Saxe) in Buckle v Abbey National plc.

  • No car allowance during maternity leave

    Date:
    1 September 1998
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Sharratt v Barclays Bank plc a Manchester employment tribunal (Chair: P J Russell) holds that it was not sex discriminatory to withdraw a company car allowance from a woman on maternity leave.

  • Breach of contract claim fails

    Date:
    1 March 1998
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Grant v South West Trains Ltd the High Court has rejected a claim that denial of travel benefits to the same-sex partner of a female employee was in breach of her contract of employment.

  • Contracts of employment: Employee did not abandon long-term sickness rights

    Date:
    1 December 1997
    Type:
    Law reports

    An employee's entitlement to benefit under his employer's permanent health insurance scheme was not terminated merely because he undertook some different work while incapacitated from working in his original job, as the scheme provided for payment of reduced benefits in such circumstances, holds the Court of Appeal in Brompton v (1) AOC International Ltd (2) Unum Ltd.

  • Adin v Sedco Forex International Resources Ltd

    Date:
    1 May 1997
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Adin v Sedco Forex International Resources Ltd [1997] IRLR 280 CS, the Court of Session held that if an employer provides sickness benefits it will be a breach of contract to dismiss an employee on grounds of ill health while he or she has sickness benefit outstanding.

  • Broad margin of discretion for Member States

    Date:
    1 May 1996
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Nolte v Landesversicherungsanstalt Hannover (14 December 1995) EOR67B, the European Court of Justice rules that the exclusion of low-paid, part-time workers from the German statutory social security scheme is permissible, even though considerably more women than men are affected.

  • Deductions from wages: Car allowances not "wages"

    Date:
    1 February 1996
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Barrie and others v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council, the EAT holds that car allowances paid to employees of the council were wholly in respect of expenses incurred by them in doing their jobs.

  • Family credit covered by Directive 76/207

    Date:
    1 November 1995
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Meyers v Adjudication Officer (13 July 1995) EOR64F, the European Court of Justice rules that a benefit such as family credit falls within the scope of the EEC Equal Treatment Directive.

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to benefits.

Benefits: key resources

Tools for pay specialists