-
- Date:
- 19 August 2019
- Type:
- Law reports
In L v Q Ltd, the Court of Appeal held that the principle of open justice precludes an employment tribunal from accepting a claimant's request that its judgment not be published on the public register of tribunal decisions.
-
- Type:
- Law reports
Updated to reflect that the Supreme Court allowed the appeal in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include references to EAT decisions concerning the impact of the fees regime on claims presented out of time, the limits of a tribunal’s power in relation to the online publication of a judgment, and the persons who may be protected by an anonymisation order.
-
- Date:
- 11 January 2019
- Type:
- Legal guidance
As always, HR professionals had their fair share of employment law cases to keep track of in 2018, but what were the 10 most important judgments in 2018 that every employer should know about?
-
- Date:
- 10 January 2019
- Type:
- Law reports
In The British Council v Jeffery; Green v SIG Trading Ltd, the Court of Appeal held that whether or not an expatriate employee has sufficiently strong connections with Great Britain to come within the scope of British employment law is a question of fact, but that such an evaluation is a question of law.
-
- Date:
- 24 August 2018
- Type:
- Law reports
In X v Y Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that an email containing legal advice on how to disguise a discriminatory dismissal as a redundancy is not protected by legal advice privilege and is admissible as evidence in a tribunal.
-
- Date:
- 11 April 2018
- Type:
- Law reports
In Fleming v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that covert recordings of the private deliberations of the disciplinary panel were admissible as evidence, except for any content covered by legal professional privilege.
-
- Date:
- 21 February 2018
- Type:
- Law reports
In Hale v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the decision to instigate the disciplinary procedure was not a one-off act, but the start of a state of affairs that would continue until the conclusion of the disciplinary process.
-
- Type:
- Policies and documents
Updated to include information on the impact on the ET1 form of Unison's successful challenge to employment tribunal fees.
-
- Type:
- Policies and documents
Updated to include information on the impact on the ET1 form of Unison's successful challenge to employment tribunal fees.
