-
- Date:
- 15 November 2017
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
This article looks at the structure of nationally and locally negotiated conditions of service in local authorities.
-
- Date:
- 7 May 2016
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In University of London v Morrissey, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that the University of London breached the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004, when it asked two recognised trade unions, whose members constituted around 25% of the workforce, to nominate employee representatives.
-
- Date:
- 1 July 2015
- Type:
- Employment law cases
David Malamatenios is a partner, and Krishna Santra, Sandra Martins and Colin Makin are senior associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.
-
- Type:
- How to
Practical guidance on negotiating changes to terms and conditions with a trade union, including the difference between collective bargaining and consultation.
-
- Date:
- 1 May 2014
- Type:
- Employment law cases
David Malamatenios is a partner, Linda Quinn and Krishna Santra senior associates and Melissa Powys-Rodrigues and Dominic Speedie associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.
-
- Date:
- 1 April 2014
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Neil Window is a trainee solicitor, Heather Marsh, Carly Mather, Associate and David Rintoul are associate solicitors, and Catherine Barker is managing associate at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
- Type:
- FAQs
-
- Type:
- FAQs
-
- Date:
- 31 December 2013
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Alemo-Herron and others v Parkwood Leisure Ltd Case C-426/11 ECJ, the ECJ held that "dynamic" clauses in contracts of employment that refer to collective agreements negotiated and adopted after the transfer are not enforceable against a transferee that has not been able to participate in the negotiating process.
-
- Date:
- 20 June 2013
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In DLA Piper's case of the week, Anderson and others v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority, the Court of Appeal considered whether or not uncertain wording in a collective agreement allowed an employer to give staff a lower pay increase than in previous years.