-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
Leading practice guidance discussing the practical and emotional support employers can provide to employees to help them cope with changes in the workplace as a result of a redundancy programme.
-
- Type:
- Employment law guide
Updated to include information on Leaney v Loughborough University, in which the EAT considered if a delay in resigning affirmed the contract of employment.
-
- Type:
- How to
Updated to reflect that the Maternity Leave, Adoption Leave and Shared Parental Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2024, which will extend redundancy protection to employees returning from adoption leave, are in force from 6 April 2024.
-
- Date:
- 10 January 2024
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
As we plunge into a new year, HR professionals could be forgiven for losing track of all the upcoming employment law changes and what they mean for their organisation. To assist HR with planning for 2024 and beyond, we round up the major legislative changes in the pipeline.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In De Bank Haycocks v ADP RPO UK Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), overturned the tribunal's decision and held that the employee's dismissal for redundancy was unfair because there was an absence of meaningful consultation at the formative stage of the redundancy process.
-
- Type:
- How to
Updated to reflect the EAT's decision in Omar v Epping Forest District Citizens Advice, which confirmed that the relevant question for heat-of-the-moment resignations is whether the employee genuinely intended to resign.
-
- Date:
- 2 November 2023
- Type:
- Podcasts and webinars
We look at workplace scenarios that can strike fear into the heart of the most experienced HR professionals, including issues relating to: discipline and grievances; redundancy; and new legislation.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Alsnih v Al Quds Al-Arabi Publishing & Advertising, an employment tribunal held that the dismissal of an employee for refusing to use a work-related app on her personal phone was procedurally and substantively unfair.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Charalambous v National Bank of Greece, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the employee's dismissal was fair even though the manager who made the decision to dismiss had not attended the disciplinary hearings.
-
- Date:
- 27 June 2023
- Type:
- Podcasts and webinars
It is critical for employers to follow a fair procedure before dismissing an employee. Here, Fiona Cuming, senior employment law editor at XpertHR, discusses a series of recent employment tribunal decisions where unfair dismissal claims proved successful because of procedural mistakes made by the employer during the disciplinary process.