-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Asda Stores Ltd v Raymond, in which the EAT held that the employee's dismissal for urinating in a loading yard was something arising from disability.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice v McCloud, in which the Court of Appeal considered whether or not transitional provisions for judges' and firefighters' pensions were justified.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, in which the Court of Appeal held that Uber drivers are workers.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, in which the Court of Appeal held that Uber drivers are workers.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, in which the Court of Appeal held that Uber drivers are workers.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, in which the Court of Appeal held that Uber drivers are workers.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, in which the Court of Appeal held that Uber drivers are workers.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, in which the Court of Appeal held that Uber drivers are workers.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
The law on discrimination in recruitment and selection, including the impact of the Equality Act 2010 on recruitment, direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, the duty to make reasonable adjustments, positive action, occupational requirements, monitoring and keeping records.
-
- Date:
- 2 May 2018
- Type:
- Law reports
In Chief Constable of Norfolk v Coffey [2018] IRLR 193 EAT, the EAT held that there was direct disability discrimination when a police officer was refused a transfer because she failed a hearing test - even though the extent of her hearing loss did not amount to a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal was entitled to find that she was perceived as being disabled and that was enough to establish her claim.
