Victimisation

New and updated

• Disability discrimination

  Type:

  Employment law manual

  Updated to include information on Forbes v LHR Airport Ltd, in which the EAT considered if posting an offensive image on Facebook was done "in the course of employment".

• Religion or belief discrimination

  Type:

  Employment law manual

  Updated to include information on Page v NHS Trust Development Authority, in which the EAT considered the distinction between a person's religious beliefs and the manner in which they express those beliefs.

• Age discrimination

  Type:

  Employment law manual

  Updated to include information on Heskett v Secretary of State for Justice, in which the EAT considered if an age discriminatory pay policy was justified.

• Pregnancy and maternity discrimination

  Type:

  Employment law manual

  Updated to include information on Forbes v LHR Airport Ltd, in which the EAT considered if posting an offensive image on Facebook was done "in the course of employment".

• Sex discrimination

  Type:

  Employment law manual

  Updated to include information on Forbes v LHR Airport Ltd, in which the EAT considered if posting an offensive image on Facebook was done "in the course of employment".

• Race discrimination

  Type:

  Employment law manual

  Updated to include information on Forbes v LHR Airport Ltd, in which the EAT considered if posting an offensive image on Facebook was done "in the course of employment".

• Sexual orientation discrimination

  Type:

  Employment law manual

  Updated to include information on Forbes v LHR Airport Ltd, in which the EAT considered if posting an offensive image on Facebook was done "in the course of employment".

• Gender reassignment discrimination

  Type:

  Employment law manual

  Updated to include information on Forbes v LHR Airport Ltd, in which the EAT considered if posting an offensive image on Facebook was done "in the course of employment".

• Marriage and civil partnership discrimination

  Type:

  Employment law manual

  Updated to include information on Forbes v LHR Airport Ltd, in which the EAT considered if posting an offensive image on Facebook was done "in the course of employment".

• Victimisation: Focus of test for bad faith is honesty, not motivation

  Date:

  30 August 2018

  Type:

  Law reports

  In Saad v Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the primary question, when deciding if an employee acted in bad faith, is whether or not the employee acted honestly in making the discrimination allegation, not the employee's ulterior purpose.