-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on United First Partners Research v Carreras, in which the Court of Appeal held that an expectation to work late amounted to a provision, criterion or practice.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on two EAT decisions considering whether or not similar changes to pensions schemes for firefighters and judges were justified.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Gould v Trustees of St John's Downshire Hill, in which the EAT considered whether or not to permit a claim for marriage discrimination to proceed.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Michalak v General Medical Council and others, in which the Supreme Court held that the employment tribunal had jurisdiction to hear a discrimination claim against the General Medical Council.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Capita Customer Management Ltd v Ali and another, in which the EAT gave the first appellate decision on a direct sex discrimination claim related to shared parental pay.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Michalak v General Medical Council and others, in which the Supreme Court held that the employment tribunal had jurisdiction to hear a discrimination claim against the General Medical Council.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Michalak v General Medical Council and others, in which the Supreme Court held that the employment tribunal had jurisdiction to hear a discrimination claim against the General Medical Council.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Guisado v Bankia SA and others, in which the ECJ considered the dismissal of pregnant workers in a collective redundancy situation.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Michalak v General Medical Council and others, in which the Supreme Court held that the employment tribunal had jurisdiction to hear a discrimination claim against the General Medical Council.
-
- Date:
- 30 August 2016
- Type:
- Law reports
In Onu v Akwiwu and another; Taiwo v Olaigbe and another [2016] IRLR 719 SC, the Supreme Court held that migrant domestic workers who were mistreated by their employers, the opportunity for which was afforded by their immigration status, were not subject to direct discrimination on grounds of their nationality. While immigration status is a function of nationality, nationality of itself was not the reason for the treatment.
