In López Ribalda and others v Spain, the European Court of Human Rights held that Spanish shop workers' right to privacy was violated when a supermarket installed hidden cameras without their knowledge to monitor employee thefts.
In Antovic and another v Montenegro, the European Court of Human Rights held that overt camera surveillance in a university's lecture halls violated professors' right to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Cases on appeal provides news on key case law developments that are expected.
In Barbulescu v Romania  IRLR 1032 ECHR, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held that the Romanian courts failed to afford adequate protection to the art.8 rights of an employee who sought to challenge his dismissal following a monitoring exercise by his employer.
Updated to include information on Benkharbouche v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs; Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Libya v Janah, in which the Supreme Court considered if state immunity could prevent claims for EU employment law breaches.
The Supreme Court has held that the State Immunity Act 1978 cannot prevent embassy staff from enforcing workplace rights derived from EU employment laws.
How should employers adapt their policies on monitoring employees' use of email or other company systems in the wake of a recent ECHR decision? Sarah Ozanne explains.
In this Romanian case, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has held that monitoring the employee's private use of a business messaging account amounted to a breach of his right to private life and correspondence under art.8.
Employers should make employees aware of any monitoring of their communications after the European Court of Human Rights ruled a man's right to privacy was breached when his employers investigated his private messages.
HR and legal information and guidance relating to human rights.