-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on United First Partners Research v Carreras, in which the Court of Appeal held that an expectation to work late amounted to a provision, criterion or practice.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on two EAT decisions considering whether or not similar changes to pensions schemes for firefighters and judges were justified.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Gould v Trustees of St John's Downshire Hill, in which the EAT considered whether or not to permit a claim for marriage discrimination to proceed.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Michalak v General Medical Council and others, in which the Supreme Court held that the employment tribunal had jurisdiction to hear a discrimination claim against the General Medical Council.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Michalak v General Medical Council and others, in which the Supreme Court held that the employment tribunal had jurisdiction to hear a discrimination claim against the General Medical Council.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Capita Customer Management Ltd v Ali and another, in which the EAT gave the first appellate decision on a direct sex discrimination claim related to shared parental pay.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Michalak v General Medical Council and others, in which the Supreme Court held that the employment tribunal had jurisdiction to hear a discrimination claim against the General Medical Council.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Guisado v Bankia SA and others, in which the ECJ considered the dismissal of pregnant workers in a collective redundancy situation.
-
- Type:
- Employment law manual
Updated to include information on Michalak v General Medical Council and others, in which the Supreme Court held that the employment tribunal had jurisdiction to hear a discrimination claim against the General Medical Council.
-
- Date:
- 10 April 2017
- Type:
- Legal guidance
Consultant editor Darren Newman explains the importance of the Supreme Court's recent decision in two joined indirect discrimination cases.
